Home | Mailing List | Specifications | Care and Feeding | Modifications | Vendors | Literature

 

Crash Test Results 


 

1996 Model Crash Tests

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Summary

The redesigned 1996 Ford Taurus moved to the front of the class in crash safety tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group supported by the insurance industry. The Institute has crash-tested 16 four-door, midsize 1995-1996 model cars and included many of the most popular vehicles in its tests.

Except for the redesigned Taurus, earlier tests on 1995 models are also valid for their 1996 versions, the Institute says, because there were no engineering changes on the '96 models that would affect crash-test results. The Institute also tested the 1996 Toyota Avalon, which did not fare well, and applied these results to 1995 Avalons.

Since 1978, federal government tests have crashed cars at 35 mph head-on into rigid barriers, providing overall information on passenger-compartment safety plus special insights into restraint systems, which are placed under great stress in head-on collisions. The IIHS test, by contrast, is an offset crash test, involving vehicles traveling at 40 mph crashing at an angle into a "deformable" or collapsible barrier. These conditions, the Institute says, resemble those in many auto-to-auto accidents. They also place more stress on the passenger compartment of the passenger compartment than do the head-on crash tests.

The Institute's test of the 1996 Taurus and Avalon models was combined with prior tests of other popular midsize cars to produce these overall safety evaluations:

Detailed Findings

Key: G = Good; A = Acceptable; M = Marginal; P = Poor.

                    Overall Structure Restraints    Injury Measures        Head      Bumper
                                                 Head/ Chest Left Right  Restraint   Repair
                                                 Neck        Leg   Leg    Design     Costs*
RATING = GOOD
Ford Taurus (1996)     G        G         G      G      G     G    G         P         G
Chevrolet Lumina       G        G         G      G      G     G    G         P         M
Ford Taurus (92-95)    G        G         G      A      G     G    G         P         M
Volvo 850              G        A         G      G      G     G    G         G         M
RATING = ACCEPTABLE
Toyota Camry           A        A         G      A      G     A    G         M         M
Subaru Legacy          A        A         G      G      G     P    G         M         A
Honda Accord           A        A         G      G      G     P    A         P         A
Mazda Millenia         A        M         G      G      G     P    G         P         M
RATING = MARGINAL
Toyota Avalon          M        M         G      G      G     P    A         P         P
Saab 900               M        P         M      G      G     G    A         A         A
RATING = POOR
Ford Contour           P        M         G      G      G     P    P         M         P
Volkswagem Passat      P        M         P      G      G     P    G         P         M
Chevrolet Cavalier     P        P         P      A      G     P    G         P         A
Mitsubishi Galant      P        P         P      G      G     P    A         P         P
Chrysler Cirrus        P        P         M      G      G     P    P         P         M
Nissan Maxima          P        A         P      M      G     P    P         M         P

* Repair costs for damages from bumper collision tests at 5 mph. Some changes in design and parts prices may have occurred during the model years shown for these vehicles, effecting repair costs since the models were tested.
Contact Information